BoootyR Spiiiiiky [Monkys]

[AA™| Vim Fuego]

Spiiiky did not say that

Where did I say he said that? Vim, seriously, like a baby. I wrote that he used THE STYLE of his answer as...
Don't use the word "lie" so easily.

There's no point getting upset and throwing insults at me - you wrote something that Spiiiky did not say, and the "style" was not even close to what he actually said, which was "Who are you, my mom?". You wanted to make Spiiiky appear abusive when he wasn't at all, and so you exaggerated wildly. If you need to use exaggeration to make your point, then it's not worth making - and make no mistake: exaggeration is lying. You lied.

Spiiiky did answer your question

No. Not true. "Accident" is too strong a word. It was not an accident in the full understanding of the meaning. "Who are you, my mom" cool answer. If it were really three accidents, Spiky was not kicking him constantly, ban. And before that, hold an explanatory conversation and make sure that he understood it.

"3 purpose crashes" - in other words, all avoidable incidents - not "accidents" as you put it, even though the word was not used in any way, shape or form. That was the answer to your question, end of story. If you don't like it, that's too bad for you. Do not presume you have any right whatsoever to question Spiiiky, or the authority that we have granted him.

Monkys knows full well that that sort of behaviour will get you banned, and he did it anyway. For all you know, Monkys has had all of this explained to him in the past, but has chosen to ignore it. If Spiiiky is anything like me, then he probably hates repeating himself, and instead took immediate action.

In closing, here's an example for you: you know full well that revenge crashing will get you banned, and yet you did it anyway. In the future I will not be so lenient - if I see you do it again, you will be banned, and you will not get an explanation first. See how that works?